Log In
en
English
Search
Search
Search
European Alien Species Information Network - Editorial Board
Close
Select your language
български
español
čeština
dansk
Deutsch
eesti
ελληνικά
English
français
Gaeilge
hrvatski
italiano
latviešu
lietuvių
magyar
Malti
Nederlands
polski
português
română
slovenčina
slovenščina
suomi
svenska
Menu
Close
Menu
Back
Home
About
EASIN in a Nutshell
Legal Framework
Species Catalogue and Geodatabase
EASIN-Lit
EASIN Team
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
How to Cite
Services
Species Search and Mapping
Web Services
NOTSYS
European Invasive Alien Species Notification System (EASIN NOTSYS)
Member States Reporting Support
Member States Competent Authorities
Documentation
IAS Union Concern Baseline
IAS of Union Concern
IAS Regulation Implementation
MSFD Descriptor 2, Non-Indigenous Species
EASIN Publications
Codes of Conduct and Guidelines
Media Repositories on IAS
IAS of Concern for the Outermost Regions
Citizen Science
Become a Citizen Scientist
Explore Citizen Science Reports
Information Factsheets
Citizen Science Projects
Training
"Have You Seen an Alien?" Game
Beware of Aliens
Contribute
How to Contribute
Editorial Board
Data Partners
Contact us
Menu
Close
Submenu
Back
Introduction
Discussions
The Board
Thread Discussion: Micropogonias undulatus
UTC Created On: 5/13/2014 11:13 AM
Author: Argyro ZENETOS
Responsible Member(s): Argyro ZENETOS ::
Argyro ZENETOS 5/13/2014 - 11:13 AM
Thread Opening Text: It seems that there are no certainties with regards a human induced introduction, so that it should be listed as questionable?
Argyro ZENETOS 5/13/2014 - 11:23 AM
this is an interesting story and a difference in the way we interpret 'baptize' alien species in the Mediterranean and in the North Sea. In the Med we tend to ignore atlantic origin species. In contrast to us, North Sea scientist report as aliens North Atlantic species occurring in their neighbor, when they appear first in their country. Thus, DAISIE reports Micropogonias as alien in the Netherlands. In the WGITMO 2001-2007 report it is also reported as alien in Belgium. In AquaNIS the species is still in the lists. Who will take responsibility to exclude it as range expansion (which I believe is the case?). I think this should be the job of a North Sea expert
Back To Threads
Post Comment